Bailout: The Road To Hell, In A Nutshell, Backwards

Was it greed? Was it capitalism? Was it super-greedy uber-capitalism?

Well, one thing’s for sure, we wouldn’t find ourselves having to bail out AIG, Freddie & Fannie, Bear Stearns, and the millions of flippers and defaulters if the real estate bubble hadn’t burst.

And, of course, the real estate bubble wouldn’t have burst if all the foreclosures and mortgage defaults hadn’t happened.

And all those people wouldn’t have defaulted and gotten foreclosed on if they hadn’t tried to buy too much house to begin with, via those vile subprime and other “predatory” (even “racist”) loans.

Which wouldn’t have happened if we hadn’t all thought real estate was a “good investment” and “always goes up”, and is “The American Dream” (which it’s not, “opportunity” is).

And, it’s important to note, Real Estate wouldn’t have “always gone up” (for 5 meager years) if the tech bubble hadn’t burst and Sir Alan Greenspan hadn’t depressed interest rates for way, way, way too long.

And those securitized rotten mortgages wouldn’t have been peddled so aggressively if Sir Alan Greenspan hadn’t depressed the interest rates for way, way, way too long, either.


Alan Greenspan wouldn’t have depressed interest rates for so damn long if the country wasn’t heading into recession after the demise of the tech bubble.

Of course the tech bubble burst because people finally realized that tech stocks don’t “always go up”.

(end interlude)

All those bad, securitized mortgages wouldn’t have (couldn’t have) been securitized if the banks, along with Freddie & Fannie, hadn’t lobbied for Republican Senators Phil Graham and James Leach to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act (a post-Great Depression law that banned banks and brokerage houses from intermingling their finances) which was passed 90-8-1, and signed by Bill Clinton.

The banks, along with Freddie & Fannie, wouldn’t have lobbied for Glass-Steagall to be repealed if the banks, along Freddie & Fannie, hadn’t been suddenly handling an ever-increasing amount of really stupid, bad mortgages.

Freddie & Fannie wouldn’t have been able to “revamp” themselves and “back” all those idiotic loans if Clinton hadn’t installed his buddy Jim Johnson and former budget director Franklin Raines (both of whom are currently high-level Obama campaign principals).

Clinton wouldn’t have installed his cronies to head up F&F (and change their rules) if the banks hadn’t cried bloody murder (lobbied) about how dangerous, and risky all these mortgages, now sitting heavily on their books, were.

And, finally, the banks would never have partaken in these super-risky mortgages in the first place had the office of Housing and Urban Development, at Clinton’s direction, not drastically increased the home ownership quotas for “minorities” and other, “less fortunate” citizens.

And Clinton would have never demanded that “minorities” and other, “less fortunate” citizens, had it not sounded so darn good. In theory. Politically.

And, well, that’s it. That is exactly what happened.

All of this with the obvious and important fact that throughout all of this the Government willfully failed to enforce laws already on the books, like you can’t loan money to someone who can’t prove their income (bank fraud) and you can’t give junk-rate securities a AAA rating when you know full well they’re junk (securities fraud).


By the way, it’s not too late to enforce these laws, and even collect money from the monumental assholes that perpetuated this mess. Both in Government and in the private sector. From Congressmen, to Fed Chairmen and Presidents. From wannabe BoilerRoom Mortgage Brokers to Wall Street CEOs. These jerks owe us money, and jail time.

(end interlude)

You know what they say about good intentions?

Whoever they are, they’re right.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  1. Jamie Holts’s avatar

    I found your site on Google and read a few of your other entires. Nice Stuff. I’m looking forward to reading more from you.


  2. johnhartmann’s avatar

    As Kennedy said: “Don’t tell me what I should have done. Tell me
    what to do now.”
    Maybe you could, too.
    Nice job.


  3. Kathy’s avatar

    Absolutely right on!!! A great, easy to read, easy to understand about what most of think of as complicated topic. Thank you for an explanation – everyone needs to read it.
    Thank you so much,


  4. edstate’s avatar

    Thanks a bunch Kathy… I’ve been searching for a straight-up explanation for this mess for a few years now. And I finally had to find it, and write it myself 😉

    Hopefully it helps get past the sound bites of “the other guy’s did it”, and more importantly helps us not go through this again.



  5. Frances’s avatar

    This is absolutely right. Unfortunately, it will become a racial issue, rather than an issue of individual responsibility.
    Everyone involved in this mess knew they were doing something wrong and did it anyway. The really sad thing is, all those ‘poor’ people who were convinced they could finally get a nice house have lost them anyway, as well as the money they couldn’t afford to spend on them.
    This is what happens when the government meddles with the markets. Now, it’s election year, and McBama are spouting off about more regulations and emergency buyouts from government institutions they want to create. When will people wake up and get these fools out of office?


  6. Kyler’s avatar

    I agree totally with your assertions. To bad the majority of the people cited as needing to prosecuted are the ones that are suppose to be enforcing the laws, or are in some way lining the pockets of those that are suppose to be enforcing the law.

    Until the average person on the street in this country has just the basic understanding of monetary policy and banking, this crap is going to continue on and on


  7. Jack’s avatar

    Very clear. Also found the video version of your intelligent deduction:–o



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *